Affiliation:
1. School of Interactive Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology
2. Human-Computer Interaction, Carnegie Mellon University
3. National Robotics Engineering Center, Carnegie Mellon University
Abstract
Creating technology products using codesign techniques often results in higher end-user engagement compared to expert-driven designs. Codesign sessions are typically structured in flexible and informal ways to achieve equal design partnerships, especially in adult-child interactions. This generally leads to better design output, however, it may also increase the enactment of socially constructed stereotypes and biases in ways that negatively affect the experiences of racial minorities and girls/women in design spaces. We codesigned a video game with a K-5 afterschool program located in a working-class, rural, predominantly white county over 20 weeks. We uncover ways that the codesign process and different activity types can create a permissive environment for enacting behaviors that are harmful to minorities. We discuss ways to manage and restructure codesign programs to be more conducive for children and adults from diverse backgrounds, ultimately leading to healthier design partnerships.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Subject
Human-Computer Interaction
Reference97 articles.
1. A Social-Cognitive Developmental Theory of Prejudice
2. My Little Robot: User Preferences in Game Agent Customization
3. Using technology, literature and guest speakers to raise the cultural awareness of Arabic language learners;Albirini A.;The International Journal of Language Society,2009
4. Using Reflexivity to Optimize Teamwork in Qualitative Research
5. Developing students’ skills for civic discourse setting the stage for civil discourse;Barss Karen;Social Education,2016