1. Thoughts on reviewing
2. Thomas Anderson . 2009 . Conference Reviewing Considered Harmful. SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev. 43 , 2 (April 2009), 108--116. Thomas Anderson. 2009. Conference Reviewing Considered Harmful. SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev. 43, 2 (April 2009), 108--116.
3. Alina Beygelzimer Yann Dauphin Percy Liang and Jennifer Wortman Vaughan. 2021. The NeurIPS 2021 Consistency Experiment. (2021). https://blog.neurips.cc/2021/12/08/the-neurips-2021-consistency-experiment/. Alina Beygelzimer Yann Dauphin Percy Liang and Jennifer Wortman Vaughan. 2021. The NeurIPS 2021 Consistency Experiment. (2021). https://blog.neurips.cc/2021/12/08/the-neurips-2021-consistency-experiment/.
4. Corinna Cortes and Neil D. Lawrence . 2021 . Inconsistency in Conference Peer Review: Revisiting the 2014 NeurIPS Experiment. CoRR abs/2109 .09774 ( 2021 ). arXiv:2109.09774 Corinna Cortes and Neil D. Lawrence. 2021. Inconsistency in Conference Peer Review: Revisiting the 2014 NeurIPS Experiment. CoRR abs/2109.09774 (2021). arXiv:2109.09774
5. Scaling the Academic Publication Process to Internet;Crowcroft Jon;Scale. Commun. ACM,2009