System Resilience through Health Monitoring and Reconfiguration
-
Published:2024-01-14
Issue:1
Volume:8
Page:1-27
-
ISSN:2378-962X
-
Container-title:ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:ACM Trans. Cyber-Phys. Syst.
Author:
Matei Ion1ORCID,
Piotrowski Wiktor1ORCID,
Perez Alexandre1ORCID,
de Kleer Johan1ORCID,
Tierno Jorge2ORCID,
Mungovan Wendy2ORCID,
Turnewitsch Vance2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. PARC, part of SRI International, USA
2. Barnstorm Research Corporation, USA
Abstract
We demonstrate an end-to-end framework to improve the resilience of man-made systems to unforeseen events. The framework is based on a physics-based digital twin model and three modules tasked with real-time fault diagnosis, prognostics and reconfiguration. The fault diagnosis module uses model-based diagnosis algorithms to detect and isolate faults and generates interventions in the system to disambiguate uncertain diagnosis solutions. We scale up the fault diagnosis algorithm to the required real-time performance through the use of parallelization and surrogate models of the physics-based digital twin. The prognostics module tracks fault progression and trains the online degradation models to compute remaining useful life of system components. In addition, we use the degradation models to assess the impact of the fault progression on the operational requirements. The reconfiguration module uses PDDL-based planning endowed with semantic attachments to adjust the system controls to minimize the fault impact on the system operation. We define a resilience metric and use a fuel system example to demonstrate how the metric improves with our framework.
Funder
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,Control and Optimization,Computer Networks and Communications,Hardware and Architecture,Human-Computer Interaction
Reference72 articles.
1. B. Amos I. Jimenez Rodriguez J. Sacks B. Boots and J. Zico Kolter. 2018. Differentiable MPC for end-to-end planning and control. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2018 (NeurIPS’18) . 8299–8310.
2. Contact and Rubbing of Flat Surfaces
3. N. Arshad and D. Heimbigner. 2005. A Comparison of Planning Based Models for Component Reconfiguration. Technical Report CU-CS-995-05. Colorado University.
4. N. Arshad, D. Heimbigner, and A. Wolf. 2003. Deployment and dynamic reconfiguration planning for distributed software systems. In IEEE ICTAI.
5. M. S. Arulampalam S. Maskell and N. Gordon. 2002. A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 50 2 (2002) 174–188.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献