Document Image Quality Assessment: A Survey

Author:

Alaei Alireza1ORCID,Bui Vinh1ORCID,Doermann David2ORCID,Pal Umapada3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Science and Engineering, Southern Cross University, Australia

2. University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, The USA

3. Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, India

Abstract

The rapid emergence of new portable capturing technologies has significantly increased the number and diversity of document images acquired for business and personal applications. The performance of document image processing systems and applications depends directly on the quality of the document images captured. Therefore, estimating the document's image quality is an essential step in the early stages of the document analysis pipeline. This article surveys research on Document Image Quality Assessment (DIQA). We first provide a detailed analysis of both subjective and objective DIQA methods. Subjective methods, including ratings and pair-wise comparison-based approaches, are based on human opinions. Objective methods are based on quantitative measurements, including document modeling and human perception-based methods. Second, we summarize the types and sources of document degradations and techniques used to model degradations. In addition, we thoroughly review two standard measures to characterize document image quality: Optical Character Recognition (OCR)-based and objective human perception-based. Finally, we outline open challenges regarding developing DIQA methods and provide insightful discussion and future research directions for this problem. This survey will become an essential resource for the document analysis research community and serve as a basis for future research.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

General Computer Science,Theoretical Computer Science

Reference122 articles.

1. The function of documents

2. International Standards - ISO/TC 42. 2022. Retrieved September 23 2022 from https://www.imaging.org/site/IST/Standards/TC_42__Standards_/IST/Standards/TC42.aspx?hkey=208a8a91-14da-4b6a-a92d-7637238308e4.

3. ISO 20462-1:2005 Photography — Psychophysical experimental methods for estimating image quality — Part 1: Overview of psychophysical elements. 2022. Retrieved September 23 2022 from https://www.iso.org/standard/38330.html.

4. A. Mittal, A. K. Moorthy, A. C. Bovik, and L. K. Cormack. 2011. Automatic prediction of saliency on JPEG distorted images. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience. 195–200.

5. V. Govindaraju and S. N. Srihari. 1995. Image quality and readability. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing. 324–327. DOI:10.1109/ICIP.1995.538547

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Assessment of Image Blurriness in Different Compression Formats;2024 International Conference on Optimization Computing and Wireless Communication (ICOCWC);2024-01-29

2. On Image Processing and Pattern Recognition for Thermograms of Watermarks in Manuscripts – A First Proof-of-Concept;Lecture Notes in Computer Science;2024

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3