Alert Prioritisation in Security Operations Centres: A Systematic Survey on Criteria and Methods

Author:

Jalalvand Fatemeh1ORCID,Baruwal Chhetri Mohan1ORCID,Nepal Surya2ORCID,Paris Cecile2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. CSIRO Data61, Clayton, Australia

2. CSIRO Data61, Marsfield, Australia

Abstract

Security Operations Centres (SOCs) are specialised facilities where security analysts leverage advanced technologies to monitor, detect, and respond to cyber incidents. However, the increasing volume of security incidents has overwhelmed security analysts, leading to alert fatigue. Effective alert prioritisation (AP) becomes crucial to address this problem through the utilisation of proper criteria and methods. Human-AI teaming (HAT) has the potential to significantly enhance AP by combining the complementary strengths of humans and AI. AI excels in processing large volumes of alert data, identifying anomalies, uncovering hidden patterns, and prioritising alerts at scale, all at machine speed. Human analysts can leverage their expertise to investigate prioritised alerts, re-prioritise them based on additional context, and provide valuable feedback to the AI system, reducing false positives and ensuring critical alerts are prioritised. This work provides a comprehensive review of the criteria and methods for AP in SOC. We analyse the advantages and disadvantages of the different categories of AP criteria and methods based on HAT, specifically considering automation, augmentation, and collaboration. We also identify several areas for future research. We anticipate that our findings will contribute to the advancement of AP techniques, fostering more effective security incident response in SOCs.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Reference149 articles.

1. Umut Acar, Peter Buneman, James Cheney, Jan Van den Bussche, Natalia Kwasnikowska, and Stijn Vansummeren. 2010. A graph model of data and workflow provenance.

2. A survey and taxonomy of techniques used for alerts of Intrusion Detection Systems

3. ISCP: In-depth model for selecting critical security controls

4. Bushra A Alahmadi, Louise Axon, and Ivan Martinovic. 2022. 99% False Positives: A Qualitative Study of SOC Analysts’ Perspectives on Security Alarms. In 31st USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 22). 2783–2800.

5. Risk Prioritization by Leveraging Latent Vulnerability Features in a Contested Environment

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3