Affiliation:
1. IBM Systems Research Institute, New York, N.Y.
Abstract
One intent of my earlier paper[1] against stack-oriented instruction sets was to revive some of the historical debate on instruction-set forms. Apparently this has been successful, since Schulthess and Kumprecht[2], and later Keedy[3], have been kind enough to continue the debate. Since I have already replied to Schulthess and Mumprecht[4], this paper is an answer to the issues raised by Keedy.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Reference7 articles.
1. The case against stack-oriented instruction sets
2. Reply to the case against stack-oriented instruction sets
3. On the use of stacks in the evaluation of expressions
4. G. J. Myers Letter to the Editor Computer Architecture News presumably to be published in volume 6 number 7. G. J. Myers Letter to the Editor Computer Architecture News presumably to be published in volume 6 number 7.
5. An Analysis of Some Commercial PL/I Programs
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献