Static vs. dynamic type systems

Author:

Stuchlik Andreas1,Hanenberg Stefan1

Affiliation:

1. University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany

Abstract

Static type systems are essential in computer science. However, there is hardly any knowledge about the impact of type systems on the resulting piece of software. While there are authors that state that static types increase the development speed, other authors argue the other way around. A previous experiment suggests that there are multiple factors that play a role for a comparison of statically and dynamically typed language. As a follow-up, this paper presents an empirical study with 21 subjects that compares programming tasks performed in Java and Groovy - programming tasks where the number of expected type casts vary in the statically typed language. The result of the study is, that the dynamically typed group solved the complete programming tasks significantly faster for most tasks - but that for larger tasks with a higher number of type casts no significant difference could be found.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design,Software

Reference24 articles.

1. Jürgen Bortz. Statistik: für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler. Springer 6. vollst. überarb. u. aktualisierte aufl. edition September 2005. Jürgen Bortz. Statistik: für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler. Springer 6. vollst. überarb. u. aktualisierte aufl. edition September 2005.

2. Studying programmer behavior experimentally

3. Five Paradigms in the Psychology of Programming

Cited by 23 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Indentation and reading time: a randomized control trial on the differences between generated indented and non-indented if-statements;Empirical Software Engineering;2024-08-09

2. Risky Dynamic Typing-related Practices in Python: An Empirical Study;ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology;2024-06-27

3. Generating Python Type Annotations from Type Inference: How Far Are We?;ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology;2024-06-03

4. How Well Static Type Checkers Work with Gradual Typing? A Case Study on Python;2023 IEEE/ACM 31st International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC);2023-05

5. Learning to Predict User-Defined Types;IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering;2023-04-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3