Affiliation:
1. University College Dublin, Ireland
2. University of Nebraska at Omaha, USA and Vienna University of Economics and Business (WU), Austria
Abstract
When Machine Learning technologies are used in contexts that affect citizens, companies as well as researchers need to be confident that there will not be any unexpected social implications, such as bias towards gender, ethnicity, and/or people with disabilities. There is significant literature on approaches to mitigate bias and promote fairness, yet the area is complex and hard to penetrate for newcomers to the domain. This article seeks to provide an overview of the different schools of thought and approaches that aim to increase the fairness of Machine Learning. It organises approaches into the widely accepted framework of pre-processing, in-processing, and post-processing methods, subcategorizing into a further 11 method areas. Although much of the literature emphasizes binary classification, a discussion of fairness in regression, recommender systems, and unsupervised learning is also provided along with a selection of currently available open source libraries. The article concludes by summarising open challenges articulated as five dilemmas for fairness research.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Subject
General Computer Science,Theoretical Computer Science
Reference318 articles.
1. One-Network Adversarial Fairness
2. Auditing black-box models for indirect influence
3. Alekh Agarwal , Alina Beygelzimer , et al . 2018 . A reductions approach to fair classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.02453(2018). Alekh Agarwal, Alina Beygelzimer, et al. 2018. A reductions approach to fair classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.02453(2018).
4. Alekh Agarwal , Miroslav Dudík , and Zhiwei Steven Wu . 2019 . Fair Regression: Quantitative Definitions and Reduction-based Algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.12843(2019). Alekh Agarwal, Miroslav Dudík, and Zhiwei Steven Wu. 2019. Fair Regression: Quantitative Definitions and Reduction-based Algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.12843(2019).
5. Allocating Interventions Based on Predicted Outcomes: A Case Study on Homelessness Services
Cited by
64 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献