Author:
Tanikawa Tomohiro,Miyakae Keisuke,Kawada Mayuko,Ishii Katunori,Fushimi Takasi,Urata Noriyo,Wada Nozomu,Nishino Ken,Suehiro Mitshiko,Kawanaka Miwa,Shiraha Hidenori,Haruma Ken,Kawamoto Hirofumi
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is associated with a variety of adverse events (AEs). One of the most important AEs is post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), which is most common in cases of difficult biliary cannulation. Although the precut technique has been reported as a PEP risk factor, recent studies indicate that early precut could reduce PEP, and that precut itself is not a risk factor.
AIM
To evaluate the safety of the precut technique, especially in terms of PEP.
METHODS
We conducted a retrospective study, spanning the period from November 2011 through December 2021. It included 1556 patients, aged ≥ 20 years, who underwent their initial ERCP attempt for biliary disease with a naïve papilla at the Kawasaki University General Medical Center. We compared the PEP risk between the early precut and the delayed precut group.
RESULTS
The PEP incidence rate did not significantly differ between the precut and non-precut groups. However, the PEP incidence was significantly lower in the early precut group than the delayed precut group (3.5% vs 10.5%; P = 0.02). The PEP incidence in the delayed precut group without pancreatic stent insertion (17.3%) was significantly higher compared to other cases (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION
Our findings indicate that early precut may reduce PEP incidence. If the precut decision is delayed, a pancreatic stent should be inserted to prevent PEP.
Publisher
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.