Author:
Reitzle Matthias,Dietrich Julia
Abstract
Change is the most prominent aspect of research endeavors in developmental and educational psychology. To date, preferred methods for studying change, especially those that rely on quantitative methodologies, are based on sample-based correlational analyses conducted with longitudinal panel studies. In this article we argue that research designs need to move beyond a between-person research strategy because dynamic processes occur within individual children and adolescents. The aim is to provide developmental and educational researchers with a guide to gathering and analyzing data so as to be able to answer questions about processes of change and development from a within-person perspective. Our discussion of current practices and our guidance on future research is based on a dynamic systems view on development.
Publisher
Verlag Barbara Budrich GmbH
Reference72 articles.
1. Aalbers, G./McNally, R. J./Heeren, A./de Wit, S./Fried, E. I. (2018): Social media and depression symptoms: A network perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000528
2. Adolph, K. E./Robinson, S. R./Young, J. W./Gill-Alvarez, F. (2008): What is the shape of developmental change? Psychological Review, 115, pp. 527-543. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.115.3.527
3. Baltes, P. B./Reese, H. W./Nesselroade, J. R. (1988): Life-span developmental psychology: Introduction to research methods (reprint of 1977 edition). – Hillsdale.
4. Beltz, A. M./Wright, A. G. C./Sprague, B. N./Molenaar, P. C. M. (2016): Bridging the nomothetic and idiographic approaches to the analysis of clinical data. Assessment, 23, pp. 447-458. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116648209
5. M. Reitzle, J. Dietrich: From Between-Person Statistics to Within-Person Dynamics
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献