Abstract
I review the two cases of industrial democracy in Norway and Mondragon using multiple perspectives. From a system thinking perspective, I use a General Systems Theory (GST), Viable Systems Model and Soft Systems Methodology. From a management perspective, I examine how institutional entrepreneurship plays a role in creating new ways of coping with regulative, normative, and cultural-cognitive forces impacting the two cases. I then view the two economies from a governmentality perspective on how they deal with power and autonomy. My analysis demonstrates that the two democracies have coped well with internal and external forces. I also argue that industrial democracy would face challenges in dealing with new ways of working that have emerged due to the influence of technology.
Publisher
Verlag Barbara Budrich GmbH
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Sociology and Political Science
Reference24 articles.
1. An introduction to cybernetics;Ashby;Methuen,1956
2. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. University of Chicago Press.
3. Baerg, A. (2009). Governmentality, neoliberalism, and the digital game. Symploke, 17(1), 115-127. http://doi.org/10.1353/sym.2009.0028.
4. Barthes, R. (2013). Mythologies. Hill & Wang.
5. Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520903053598.