Development of a Uniform Approach to Writing and Grading of Laboratory Reports in Horticultural Science Courses

Author:

Anderson Neil O.,Hoover Emily E.,Longo Bernadette,Ross Marjorie

Abstract

Written scientific communication, such as laboratory reports, are important components of undergraduate educationwithin the sciences. Since most Horticultural Science majors offer lecture- and lab-based courses, students oftenwrite laboratory reports for many courses across the curriculum and these reports comprise a large percentage of thewriting assignments in these classes. Instructors link learning objectives with laboratory reports to reinforce coursecontent. Students have noted inconsistencies across horticulture courses in requirements for laboratory report writing,which often leads to confusion. Thus, development of a grading rubric would improve the continuity of expectationsof laboratory report writing and grading within a Horticultural Science curriculum for instructors teaching coursesrequiring laboratory reports.When focusing just on laboratory writing in the curriculum, surveys and interviews indicated that a disconnect existsbetween what instructors expect of their students and what the stated learning outcomes were for their courses.Student’s ability to analyze results was seen as both a strength and weakness, as reported from faculty responses. Inlower division courses, analyzing results from student’s experiments was a weakness while in upper division coursesfaculty responses were mixed as to whether students had the skills to sufficiently analyze results from theirexperiments.When a grading rubric was trialed, students indicated that use of the same rubric in other Horticultural Sciencecourses would demystify the process of conducting research and communicating it effectively in laboratory reports.For this work to expand, one or more standard rubrics need to be developed for use by Horticultural Science courseswithin an institution to enhance our students’ abilities to become competent writers in this form of scientificcommunication. A baseline rubric for courses at the 3000 level was developed to serve as a template to further thisprocess.

Publisher

Sciedu Press

Subject

General Engineering

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. How Online Grading Feedback Might Benefit From a Grounding in Feminist Theory;Research Anthology on Feminist Studies and Gender Perceptions;2022

2. How Online Grading Feedback Might Benefit From a Grounding in Feminist Theory;Reshaping Graduate Education Through Innovation and Experiential Learning;2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3