Assessment of the Attitude and Knowledge About Abortion and Its Consequences in Women Attending Obstetrics Unit at A Public Hospital: A Prospective, Descriptive Survey-Based Study

Author:

Ponnusankar Sivasankaran1ORCID,Vishwas Hunsur Nagendra1ORCID,Kumar Siva Manoj1ORCID,Balasubramaniam Viswanathan2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pharmacy Practice, JSS College of Pharmacy, JSS Academy of Higher Education & Research

2. Department of Surgery, Govt. Medical College & Hospital

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed at assessing the attitude and knowledge about abortion and its consequences in women attending obstetrics units at a public hospital. Methods: This was a prospective, descriptive survey-based study with a purposive sampling technique involving women above 18 years attending obstetrics and gynecology unit at a public hospital. Results: A total of 209 females were approached, finally 127 respondents agreed to participate in the study. About 85.04% (n=108) of them knew about abortion. 61.42% (n=78) of respondents indicated that they did not know the methods of abortion, and among them, 63.75% (n=49) were aware of unsafe abortion practices; very few of the respondents preferred the traditional practice for abortion. 56.69% (n=72) of the respondents were not aware of the possible dangers of abortion; and 85.83% (n=109) of the respondents would seek advice on abortion (if necessary) from a qualified doctor. Conclusion: The study participants demonstrated good knowledge and attitudes towards abortion and its consequences. The study also showed the maximum number of respondents who had heard about abortion but had less knowledge of the consequences of unsafe practices. The study revealed that respondents' age, number of children, religion, and educational level had no significant influence on their knowledge and attitude. Keywords: health surveys, complications, knowledge, spontaneous abortion

Publisher

Eurasian Society of Family Medicine

Subject

General Medicine

Reference16 articles.

1. Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Spong CY, Dashe JS, Hoffman BL, et al. Abortion. In: Horsager R, Roberts S, Rogers V, Santiago-Munoz P, Worley K (Eds.). Williams Obstetrics, 24th ed. New York;Mc-Graw Hill, 2014:350-76.

2. Griebel CP, Halvorsen J, Golemon TB, Day AA. Management of spontaneous abortion. Am Fam Physician 2005;72(7):1243-50. PMID: 16225027.

3. Annas GJ, Elias S. Ethical and legal issues in perinatology. In: Gabbe SG, Niebyl JR, Simpson JL, Landon MB, Galan HL, Jauniaux ER (Eds). Obstetrics: normal and problem pregnancies. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2017:1183-95.

4. Kapp N, Eckersberger E, Lavelanet A, Rodriguez MI. Medical abortion in the late first trimester: A systematic review. MMWR Recomm Rep 2016;65(4):1–66. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6504a1.

5. Ismail KM. Psychological challenges in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynaecol 2008;10(3):206. doi: 10.1576/toag.10.3.206a.27427.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3