Risk analysis and management according to Russian and international safety standards

Author:

Smirnova E. E.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering

Abstract

The paper analyzes the safety aspects outlined in national standards. The considered normative documentation answers the question of how to achieve acceptable risk levels. The basic concepts of risk assessment are presented. Positive changes in Russian safety standards are noted. There is no unified code in the legislation of the Russian Federation on environmental issues: there are federal laws, codes on certain environmental areas, as well as bylaws and legal acts of the subjects of the Russian Federation. Federal Law No. 7 “On Environmental Protection” should be mentioned among the main laws related to the regulation of environmental safety in construction. However, this law regulates the employer's leadership rather than their responsibility. The use of certain fines and penalties seems quite reasonable within the framework of improving environmental audit and management. At the same time, the international standard ISO 14001:2015 is aimed at forming a responsible attitude toward the ecosystem and natural resources as the most important asset of economic activity, rather than at specifying the need for managers to demonstrate leadership qualities as the main factor of environmental safety. As a result, risk analysts cannot be fully guided by the standards because they are not aligned with the universal international standard ISO 31000:2018, which creates a significant problem. An approach to risk assessment that describes the interaction of different scenarios should be developed, which will provide an increased ecological and economic effect.

Publisher

Irkutsk National Research Technical University

Subject

General Medicine

Reference20 articles.

1. Crispin G. The essence of risk identification in project risk management: An overview. International Journal of Science and Research. 2020;9(2):1553-1557. https://doi.org/10.21275/SR20215023033.

2. Gallop D., Willy C., Bischoff J. How to catch a black swan: Measuring the benefits of the premortem technique for risk identification. Journal of Enterprise Transformation. 2016;6(2):87-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/19488289.2016.1240118.

3. Rausand M., Haugen S. Risk assessment: Theory, methods, and applications. London: Wiley; 2020. 784 p.

4. Matuszak-Flejszman A., Paliwoda B. Influence of the Implemented Management Systems on Risk-Based Thinking in Organizations – A Review. In: Proceedings of the 36th International Business Information Management Association (IBIMA). Cordoba: IBIMA; 2022. p. 6644-6651.

5. de Melo F.J. C, de Medeiros D.D. Applying interpretive structural modeling to analyze the fundamental concepts of the management excellence model guided by the risk-based thinking of ISO 9001:2015. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal. 2020;27:742-772. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2020.1752144.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Ensuring the environmental safety of technogenic objects based on green standards;Izvestiya vuzov. Investitsii. Stroitelstvo. Nedvizhimost;2024-01-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3