1. 1. Claeys MJ, Bosmans J, Veenstra L, Jorens P, De Raedt H, Vrints CJ. Determinants and prognostic implications of persistent ST-segment elevation after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: Importance of microvascular reperfusion injury on clinical outcome. Circulation 1999; 99: 1972–1977.
2. 2. Brodie BR, Stuckey TD, Hansen C, VerSteeg DS, Muncy DB, Moore S, et al. Relation between electrocardiographic ST-segment resolution and early and late outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2005; 95: 343–348.
3. 3. McLaughlin MG, Stone GW, Aymong E, Gardner G, Mehran R, Lansky AJ, et al. Prognostic utility of comparative methods for assessment of ST-segment resolution after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: The Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 1215–1223.
4. 4. Matano S, Iwasaki K, Kusachi S, Murakami T, Kurazono S, Yamaji H, et al. ST-segment re-elevation unrelated to left ventricular ejection fraction or volume after anterior wall acute myocardial infarction treated with successful reperfusion. J Electrocardiol 2002; 35: 87–93.
5. 5. Matetzky S, Novikov M, Gruberg L, Freimark D, Feinberg M, Elian D, et al. The significance of persistent ST elevation versus early resolution of ST segment elevation after primary PTCA. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 34: 1932–1938.