Affiliation:
1. Lomonosov Moscow State University; Eurasian Center for Food Security
Abstract
With the development of the trend towards robot facilitation of farmers’ work, the need for their most effective implementation in the agricultural sector (including horticulture) becomes more urgent. In materials science and agricultural freight robotics, there is still no univocal opinion on what structural materials are most preferable based on technical, economic, and environmental criteria. Authors rarely relate the capabilities of structural materials for robots to a decrease in specific ground pressure. Engineering needs studies comparing different structural materials most suitable to produce agricultural load-carrying robots. This article aims to conduct a comparative investigation of three variants for an agricultural robotic truck with a steel, aluminum, or fiberglass body to justify the most acceptable material. Aluminum was hypothesized to be superior to steel and fiberglass as an agricultural freight robot material. Three robot versions were constructed using steel, aluminum, or fiberglass. They were then tested under field conditions, and the obtained results were recorded. In economic terms, using fi berglass is more justifi ed than aluminum. This is explained by the reduction in robot operating costs due to the lower density of fiberglass (1,900 versus 2,700 kg/m3). However, in terms of the environmental criterion, fiberglass loses because it contains formaldehyde and is difficult to recycle.
Publisher
Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution All-Russian Horticultural Institute for Breeding Agrotechnology and Nursery
Reference12 articles.
1. Ramesh B. N., Nabokov V. I., Skvortsov E. A. Classification and features of robotics in agriculture. Agrarian Bulletin of the Urals. 2017;02(156):82-88.
2. Skvortsov E. A., Skvortsova E. G., Sandu I. S., Iovlev G. A. The transition of agriculture to digital, intelligent and robotic technologies. Regional Economy. 2018. Т. 14, vol. 3:1014-1028. DOI: 10.17059/2018-3-23 (In Russ.).
3. Birner R., Daum T., Pray C. Who drives the digital revolution in agriculture? A review of supply-side trends, players and challenges.Appl Econ Perspect Policy. 2021:1-26. doi: 10.1002/aepp.13145.
4. Sandler B.-Z. Robotics: Designing the Mechanisms for Automated Machinery. Academic Press. 2 nd ed. 1999;433 p. ISBN: 0-12-618520-4. URL: http://www.robot.bmstu.ru/files/books/[Robotic]%20Robotics%20-%20Designing%20the%20Mechanisms%20-%20Ben-Zion%20Sandier.pdf (date accessed: 17. 12. 2021).
5. Boyko A. Participants of the agricultural robots market. URL: http://robotrends.ru/robopedia/uchastniki-rynka-selskohozyaystvennyh-robotov (date accessed: 17. 12. 2021). (In Russ.)