Abstract
The goal of this study was to evaluate tooth size discrepancies in Kosovar adolescents according to the Bolton’s analysis, and to determine the differences between gender and malocclusion classes.
A sample of 400 Kosovar adolescents, aged 13–19 years with various malocclusion categories (class I, II, III) according to the Angle’s classification, was randomly selected. The anterior tooth size ratio, overall tooth size ratio, posterior tooth size ratio, as well as distribution of tooth size discrepancies were assessed. The normality of distribution was assessed by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, the differences between genders by the Independent Sample T-test, the Mann-Whitney U-test, and differences among malocclusion groups by ANOVA, the Kruskal-Wallis, and the Dunn’s post-hoc tests.
The tooth size ratios of men and women did not differ significantly. The results also demonstrated significant differences among the malocclusion classes only for the anterior tooth size ratio (p<0.05). The overall and posterior ratios did not differ significantly within malocclusion classes. The percentages of Kosovar subjects with a deviation of more than 2SD from the Bolton average for the anterior and overall ratios were 41.37 and 23.79, respectively.
The genders did not differ significantly regarding tooth size ratios. Among the malocclusion classes, the anterior ratio differed significantly. In Kosovar subjects, tooth size discrepancies tend to be higher compared to Bolton’s averages.
Publisher
Uniwersytet Lodzki (University of Lodz)
Subject
Anthropology,Health (social science)
Reference40 articles.
1. Akyalçin S, Doğan S, Dinçer B, Erdinc AM, Oncağ G. 2006. Bolton tooth size discrepancies in skeletal class I individuals presenting with different dental angle classifications. Angle Orthod 76:637–43. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0637:BTSDIS]2.0.co;2
2. Alam MK, Hassan R, Mahmood Z, Haq ME. 2013. Determination and comparison of tooth size and tooth size ratio in normal occlusion and different malocclusion groups. Int Med J 20:462–65.
3. Al-Khateeb SN, Abu Alhaija ES. 2006. Tooth size discrepancies and arch parameters among different malocclusion in a Jordan sample. Angle Orthod 76:459–65. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0459:TSDAAP]2.0.CO;2
4. Al-Omari IK, Al-Bitar ZB, Hamdan AM. 2008. Tooth size discrepancies among Jordanian schoolchildren. Eur J Orthod 30:527–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjn030
5. Angle GM. 1899. Classification of Malocclusion. Dental Cosmos 41:248–64.