Author:
Dey Sima,Mondal Nitish,Bose Kaushik
Abstract
The tribal population (8.6%) is vulnerable to neonatal mortality and morbidity in India. Birth weight is an important decisive factor for most neonatal survival and postnatal development. The present study aims to compare the prevalence and associations of certain socio-economic, demographic, and lifestyle variables with low birth weight (LBW) among tribal and non-tribal populations in India. The present investigation utilized retrospective data of the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4, 2015–16) among tribal (N=26635) and non-tribal (N=142162) populations in India. Birth weight variation of the newborn was categorized into LBW (<2500 gm) and NBW (≥2500 gm). ANOVA, chi-square (χ2) analysis, and binary logistic regression (BLR) were applied using SPSS (version 16.0). The prevalence of LBW was higher in non-tribal (17.2%) than tribal (13.5%), and the population-specific birth weight was significantly higher in tribal than non-tribal population (p<0.01). Higher tribal population concentration (47.0%) areas has a lower (7.4%) prevalence of LBW in the northeast zone, whereas greater non-tribal population concentration (27.1%) areas was found higher in the central zone (19.2%). The BLR analysis showed that rural habitat, lower educational attainment, lack of own sanitary toilet facility, a lower wealth index, absence of electricity, high pollutant fuel exposure, Hindu and Muslim religion, elevated maternal age at first birth, maternal anemia as well as home delivery of newborn have greater odds for LBW (p<0.05). In India, tribal populations are vulnerable and marginalised; their birth weight is significantly higher than that of non-tribals, and they have a lower prevalence of LBW and higher female birth rates. Mother’s socio-economic status and perceptions towards hygiene and better lifestyles acquired by educational upliftment positively affect the birth weight of the newborn in both the tribal and non-tribal population in India.
Publisher
Uniwersytet Lodzki (University of Lodz)
Subject
Anthropology,Health (social science)
Reference63 articles.
1. Abraham M, Alramadhan S, Iniguez C, Duijts L, Jaddoe VW, Den Dekker HT et al. 2017. A systematic review of maternal smoking during pregnancy and fetal measurements with meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 12(2):e0170946, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170946
2. Anderson I, Robson B, Connolly M, Al- Yaman F, Bjertness E, King A. et al. 2016. Indigenous and tribal peoples’ health (The Lancet-Lowitja institute global collaboration): A population study. Lancet 388(10040):131–157, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00345-7
3. Azcorra H, Mendez N. 2018. The influence of maternal height on offspring’s birth weight in Merida, Mexico. Am J Hum Biol 1-7, https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.23162
4. Baker KK, Story WT, Walser-Kuntz E, Zimmerman MB. 2018. Impact of social capital, harassment of women and girls, and water and sanitation access on premature birth and low infant birth weight in India. PLoS One 13(10):e0205345, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205345
5. Bharali N, Mondal N. 2021. Association of Age at Marriage, Early childbearing, Use of contraceptive Methods and Reproductive Health Consequences among Mishing tribal women of Assam, Northeast India. The Online Journal of Health and Allied Sciences 20(3):2, https://www.ojhas.org/issue79/2021-3-2.html