Abstract
The abolition of slavery by modern states was an important step towards the recognition of what is now known as human rights. The British Empire and its cradle, England, were the leading entities responsible for the support of the international trade slave. For this reason, its antislavery movement is one which deserves particular attention. The argumentation used by the abolitionists has been a subject of many studies. Philosophical, theological or commercial arguments against slavery are well researched. It needs to be emphasised, however, that abolition was a legal step. In this context, it is interesting to seek legal argumentation against the enslavement of people. It is obvious that an appropriate reasoning would be difficult to find. Slavery has been a common social institution since ancient times. The universal principles of Roman law, as well as the significance of Roman civilisation for the development of the Western culture, made it one obvious field of research. The main aim of this article is to check if reference to Roman antiquity has been one of the crucial arguments in the antislavery struggle in Britain.
Publisher
Uniwersytet Lodzki (University of Lodz)
Reference48 articles.
1. Baker, John H. 2002. An Introduction to English Legal History. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Berman, Harold J. 1983. Law and Revolution. The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge, MA–London: Harvard University Press.
3. Blackstone, William. 2002. Commentaries on the Laws of England. A Facsimile of the First Edition of 1765–1769. With an Introduction by Stanley N. Katz. Vol. 1. Chicago–London: University of Chicago Press.
4. Bradley, Keith. 1994. Slavery and Society at Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Bradley, Keith. Paul Cartledge. Eds. 2011. The Cambridge World History of Slavery. Vol. 1. The Ancient Mediterranean World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.