Abstract
The article focuses on the problem of the narrator’s and the author’s identity in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. According to Charles Taylor’s philosophy of subjectivity in order to have an identity we have to know what kind of good we would like to fulfil in our life. Such an orientation to the good (an orientation in moral space) and an endeavour after realizing this main value defines us as ourselves. In the paper it is argued that the pursuit of trespassing boundaries is constitutive to the narrator’s identity in the novel as it is such kind of an aim without which they could not have been themselves. It is also the key to the author’s identity. Through the medium of the stories of her male story-tellers she confronts her own demons, explores the territories of the subconscious beyond the bounds of understanding and depicts her struggle with the limitations she overcame as a woman in a patriarchal society and as a person who invented a new literary genre – science-fiction literature.
Publisher
Uniwersytet Lodzki (University of Lodz)
Reference12 articles.
1. Baldick, Chris. In Frankenstein’s Shadow. Myth, Monstrosity, and Nineteenth-Century Writing. Oxford: Clarendon P, 1996. Print.
2. Benford, Criscillia. "'Listen to my tale': Multilevel Structure, Narrative Sense Making, and the Inassimilable in Mary Shelley‘s Frankenstein." Narrative 3 (2010): 324-46. Print.
3. Britton, Jeanne M. “Novelistic Sympathy in Mary Shelley‘s Frankenstein.” Studies in Romanticism 1 (2009): 3-23. Print.
4. Brown, Marshall. “A Philosophical View of the Gothic Novel.” Studies in Romanticism 2 (1987): 275-301. Print.
5. Burke, Edmund. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1958. Print.