Triangulation and Dealing with The Realness of Qualitative Research

Author:

Konecki Krzysztof T.

Abstract

This paper provides a sociologists’ reflection of a sociologist on qualitative field research. Reflections will include some methodological and epistemological considerations that are connected with field work, while building the realness of the description and conclusions, i.e. constructing the quality of qualitative research. The intellectual process of doing research will be characterized by analysis of: description of investigated reality (tales of the field), analytical process, usage of commonsense research procedures (so called triangulation procedures), which are used in the field by the researcher and during analysis or writing a research report to adequately “re – present” researched reality. The three above mentioned stages of representation of reality are interwoven to create one complex intellectual process, which is called “field research”. The quality of qualitative research is the intellectual process where some procedures are used to create the accountability of research conclusions.

Publisher

Uniwersytet Lodzki (University of Lodz)

Subject

General Social Sciences

Reference62 articles.

1. Anderson, Nels (1965/1923) The Hobo. The Sociology of The Homeless Man. Chicago, London: Phoenix Books, The University of Chicago Press.

2. Atkinson Paul and Martyn Hammersley (1994) Ethnography and participant observation. In: Denzin Norman, Yvonna Lincoln, ed. (1994) Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage.

3. Belousov, Konstantin and Tom Horlick-Jones, Michael Bloor, Yakov Gilinskiy, Valentin Golbert, Yakov Kostikovsky, Michael Levi, and Dmitri Pentsov (2007) Any port in a storm: fieldwork difficulties in dangerous and crisis-ridden settings, Qualitative Research 7 (2):155–175.

4. Bateson, Gregory (1996), Umysł i przyroda. Jedność konieczna.(Mind and Nature. A Necessary Unity). Warszawa: PIW.

5. Becker, Howard (2003) “The Politics of Presentation: Goffman and Total Institutions.” Symbolic Interaction, 26, 4:659–669.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3