Abstract
This paper provides a sociologists’ reflection of a sociologist on qualitative field research. Reflections will include some methodological and epistemological considerations that are connected with field work, while building the realness of the description and conclusions, i.e. constructing the quality of qualitative research. The intellectual process of doing research will be characterized by analysis of:
description of investigated reality (tales of the field),
analytical process,
usage of commonsense research procedures (so called triangulation procedures), which are used in the field by the researcher and during analysis or writing a research report to adequately “re – present” researched reality.
The three above mentioned stages of representation of reality are interwoven to create one complex intellectual process, which is called “field research”. The quality of qualitative research is the intellectual process where some procedures are used to create the accountability of research conclusions.
Publisher
Uniwersytet Lodzki (University of Lodz)
Reference62 articles.
1. Anderson, Nels (1965/1923) The Hobo. The Sociology of The Homeless Man. Chicago, London: Phoenix Books, The University of Chicago Press.
2. Atkinson Paul and Martyn Hammersley (1994) Ethnography and participant observation. In: Denzin Norman, Yvonna Lincoln, ed. (1994) Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage.
3. Belousov, Konstantin and Tom Horlick-Jones, Michael Bloor, Yakov Gilinskiy, Valentin Golbert, Yakov Kostikovsky, Michael Levi, and Dmitri Pentsov (2007) Any port in a storm: fieldwork difficulties in dangerous and crisis-ridden settings, Qualitative Research 7 (2):155–175.
4. Bateson, Gregory (1996), Umysł i przyroda. Jedność konieczna.(Mind and Nature. A Necessary Unity). Warszawa: PIW.
5. Becker, Howard (2003) “The Politics of Presentation: Goffman and Total Institutions.” Symbolic Interaction, 26, 4:659–669.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献