Author:
Munn Melissa,Bruckert Chris
Abstract
Contemporary resistance scholarship increasingly positions individuals as agents operating within power relations and as such, this stimulating and diverse body of work illuminates the complexity of powerresistance. The richness of this academic engagement notwithstanding, there continues to be a paucity of work which offers a framework for conducting an analysis of resistance. In this article, we propose a general framework through which power-resistance can be coded, analyzed and theorized. Using data from an ethnomethodological study of 20 former longterm male prisoners in Canada, we demonstrate the usefulness of our 'resistance pyramid' to render visible the objectives, purposes, strategies, tactics and skills which characterize the processes, and not just the practices, of resistance. We argue that it is exactly these, often obscured, processes that allow us to appreciate the density of resistance-power, the multiple ways it operates and the significance of individuals' social, personal or political capital.
Publisher
Uniwersytet Lodzki (University of Lodz)
Reference47 articles.
1. Aretxaga, Begona (1995) "Dirty protest: Symbolic overdetermination and gender in Northern Ireland ethnic violence". Ethos 23 (2).
2. Bosworth, Mary (1999) Engendering resistance: Agency and power in women’s prisons. Brookfield, Vermont: Ashgate Publishing.
3. Bosworth, Mary and Carrabine Eamonn (2001) "Reassessing resistance: Race, gender and sexuality in prison". Punishment and Society 3 (4):501-515.
4. Bruckert, Chris (2002) Taking it off, putting it on: Women in the strip trade. Toronto, Ontario: Women's Press.
5. Buntman, Fran and Huang, Tong-Yi (2000) "The role of political imprisonment in developing and enhancing political leadership: A comparative study of South Africa's and Taiwan's democratization". JAAS XXXV 1:43-66.