Abstract
I reflect upon Dr. William Shaffir’s influence on my approach to ethnographic research and my study of homeless shelter workers. Dr. Shaffir introduced me to his own brand of the craft of qualitative field work, but also introduced me to important sociologists and ideas in the symbolic interactionist tradition. Most central was Everett C. Hughes’ notion of “dirty work,” which helped shape my research focus. Building from Hughes’ concept, but expanding it with Shaffir and Pawluch’s (2003) social constructionist approach to occupations, I was better able to conceptualize the process of how workers themselves piece together the meaning of “dirty work.” Beyond gaining these conceptual insights, I also reflect on Dr. Shaffir’s teaching philosophy of qualitative methods, that is, the importance of learning by doing. I conclude with some thoughts regarding Shaffir’s perspective on the wider ethnographic task of describing, in situ, members’ understandings and definitions. Following Everett Hughes, I call on interactionists to give more attention to “dirty work” as a generic and transcontextual process.
Publisher
Uniwersytet Lodzki (University of Lodz)
Reference47 articles.
1. Adorjan, Michael. 2019. “Social Constructionism Now More Than Ever: Following the Hermeneutic Money Trail in a PostTruth World.” The American Sociologist 50(2):160-174.
2. Becker, Howard S. 1986. Doing Things Together. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
3. Ben-Yehuda, Nachman et al. 1989. “Howard S. Becker: A Portrait of an Intellectual’s Sociological Imagination.” Sociological Inquiry 59(4):467-489.
4. Berger, Peter L. 2002. “Whatever Happened to Sociology?” First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion and Public Life 126(October):27-30.
5. Blumer, Herbert. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley: University of California Press.