How Reflection Works in Transformative Dialogue/Mediation: A Preliminary Investigation

Author:

Garcia Angela CoraORCID,Cleven ErikORCID

Abstract

Transformative dialogue and mediation (TD/M) is an approach to conflict resolution used in mediation and inter-group dialogues about social justice and race, political polarization, and ethnopolitical conflict. TD/M practitioners believe their approach supports the agency of participants and helps them interact with greater confidence, self-awareness, and understanding of the perspectives of others. However, previous research on TD/M has not yet addressed how it achieves those outcomes. This pilot study works to fill that gap by investigating how reflection, the most commonly used TD/M technique, is utilized in a facilitated meeting of the steering committee of a non-profit organization. We conduct a qualitative sequential analysis of a video-recorded interaction to investigate how TD/M reflection is done. We show how the TD/M facilitator of the meeting reflects participants’ statements with the techniques of mirroring, substituting, and omitting and how the participants respond to those reflections with agreement or repair. The results of the analysis are discussed in terms of their implications for understanding how TD/M facilitation works.

Publisher

Uniwersytet Lodzki (University of Lodz)

Reference67 articles.

1. Antes, James R., Joseph P. Folger, and Dorothy J. Della Noce. 2000. “Transforming Conflict Interactions in the Workplace: Documented Effects of the USPS Redress Program.” Hofstra Labor and Employment Law Journal 18(2):429-468.

2. Atkinson, J. Maxwell and Paul Drew. 1979. Order in Court: The Organisation of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. London: Macmillan Press.

3. Atkinson, J. Maxwell and John Heritage, eds. 1984. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

4. Barnes, Rebecca. 2007. “Formulations and the Facilitation of Common Agreement in Meetings Talk.” Text & Talk 27(3):273-296.

5. Bishop, Peter et al. 2015. The Art and Practice of Mediation. Toronto: Emond Montgomery Publications.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3