Politically Sensitive Encounters: Ethnography, Access, and the Benefits of “Hanging Out”

Author:

Browne Brendan Ciarán,McBride Ruari-Santiago

Abstract

Negotiating politically sensitive research environments requires both a careful consideration of the methods involved and a great deal of personal resolve. In drawing upon two distinct yet comparable fieldwork experiences, this paper champions the benefits of ethnographic methods in seeking to gain positionality and research legitimacy among those identified as future research participants. The authors explore and discuss their use of the ethnographic concept of “hanging out” in politically sensitive environments when seeking to negotiate access to potentially hard to reach participants living in challenging research environments. Through an illustrative examination of their experiences in researching commemorative rituals in Palestine and mental health in a Northern Irish prison, both authors reflect upon their use of “hanging out” when seeking to break down barriers and gain acceptance among their target research participants. Their involvement in a range of activities, not directly related to the overall aims of the research project, highlights a need for qualitative researchers to adopt a flexible research design, one that embraces serendipitous or chance encounters, when seeking to gain access to hard to reach research participants or when issues of researcher legitimacy are particularly pronounced, such as is the case in politically sensitive research environments.

Publisher

Uniwersytet Lodzki (University of Lodz)

Subject

General Social Sciences

Reference44 articles.

1. Adler, Patricia A. and Peter Adler. 1987. Membership Roles in Field Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

2. Adler, Patricia and Peter Adler. 2012. “Keynote Address, Tales From the Field: Reflections on Four Decades of Ethnography.” Qualitative Sociology Review 3(1):11-32.

3. APA. 2000. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Washington: American Psychiatric Association.

4. Atkinson, Paul and Martyn Hammersley. 1994. “Ethnography and Participant Pbservation.” Pp. 248-260 in Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

5. Becker, Howard S. 1963. Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: Free Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3