National Business Cultures as a System‑forming Factor of the “Lublin Triangle”

Author:

Glinkowska‑Krauze BeataORCID,Chebotarov ViacheslavORCID,Chebotarov IegorORCID

Abstract

Considering the evolution of the scientific knowledge on the topic the authors define “national business cultures” as a complex interdisciplinary basic phenomenon of modern comparative studies and international entrepreneurship. Using the accepted in the world comparative studies methodology – indicative parameters of national business cultures and considering the authors’ corresponding empirical developments a systematic comparative analysis of the national business cultures of the founding countries of the new cooperation platform in Central and Eastern Europe – the “Lublin Triangle” (Poland, Lithuania, Ukraine) – is carried out. The close similarity and wide complementarity of the national business cultures of these countries are revealed. This is largely predetermined not only by their common, centuries‑old history, but also by a number of other institutional and economic factors, as well as natural conditions. The priority sectors and spheres of integration of the three countries are determined both at the interstate level and at the level of the interaction of their business structures. Implementing this approach will ensure an increase in the competitive positions of Poland, Lithuania, and Ukraine and, as a result, the Lublin Triangle as a whole, in the system of the modern international division of labor. Based on the similarity and complementarity of the national business cultures, a group of other countries of Central and Eastern Europe (Latvia, Estonia, Slovakia, Romania, and Bulgaria) was selected. Under certain conditions, they could also become members of the Lublin Triangle, which would further strengthen and develop the European Union.

Publisher

Uniwersytet Lodzki (University of Lodz)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference21 articles.

1. Cohen, M. (2005), Why customers do what they do: Who they are, why they buy, and how you can anticipate their every move, McGraw‑Hill Education, New York.

2. Deutscher, G. (2010), Through the Language Glass: Why the World Looks Different in Other Languages, William Heinemann Ltd., London.

3. Erdman, K.M. (2017), An Analysis of Geert Hofstede’s Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutes and Organizations Across Nations, Routledge, London, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781912128334

4. Glinkowska, B. (2018), Internacjonalizacja polskich i ukraińskich przedsiębiorstw, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź.

5. Glinkowska, B., Chebotarov, V.A. (2018), Comparative Cross Cultural Analysis of the Profile of a Modern Ukrainian Manager: The Imperatives of the Future in the Context of Internationalization, “Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe”, 21 (3), pp. 63–74, https://doi.org/10.2478/cer-2018-0019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3