Quantification of the Size of Local Public Administration: Empirical Study of Polish Regions

Author:

Skica Tomasz,Dvouletý Ondřej

Abstract

The issue of the size of public administration is commonly researched. Most of the times this topic is tackled from a macroeconomic perspective, considering local and central administration together. That is why this paper uniquely takes on the local perspective only, analysing the size of local government (i.e. size of public administration at the local level) in Polish regions during the period of 2009–2013. Based on the existing literature, we chose five variables of the size of local administration at the commune level connected with employment and reflecting costs related to the functioning of local administration structures. All indicators were expressed per capita. With the usage of ANOVA, we proved significant differences in the size of public administration across regions for all variables. To compare the size of local governments across regions, we ranked all variables individually, and then we calculated the average ranking for all variables. Our findings have clear implications for policy makers, providing information about the regions with the biggest/smallest size of public administration at the local level. Our study suggests simple and accessible tool for continuous reporting on the size of public administration in order to monitor costs also in the upcoming years. The results of the monitoring could also be used for the establishment of an incentive program for regional policy representatives.

Publisher

Uniwersytet Lodzki (University of Lodz)

Subject

Geography, Planning and Development

Reference53 articles.

1. Afonso, A. and Jalles, J. T. (2016), ‘Economic performance, government size, and institutional quality’, Empirica, 43 (1), pp. 83–109.

2. Anderson, J. E. (2012), Public finance, Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.

3. Andrews, R. and Boyne, G. A. (2009), ‘Size, structure and administrative overheads: An empirical analysis of English local authorities’, Urban Studies, 46 (4), pp. 739–759.

4. Baqir, R. (1999), ‘Districts, spill-overs, and government overspending’, Macroeconomics and Growth Working Paper, 2192, Development Research Group, World Bank Publications.

5. Bardes, B., Shelley, M., Schmidt, S. (2014), American Government and Politics Today: The Essentials 2013–2014 Edition, Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3