Author:
Del Río Miguel,Miller Corey,Profant Ján,Drexler-Fox Jennifer,Mcnamara Quinn,Bhandari Nishchal,Delworth Natalie,Pirkin Ilya,Jetté Migüel,Chandra Shipra,Ha Peter,Westerman Ryan
Abstract
Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) systems generalize poorly on accented speech, creating bias issues for users and providers. The phonetic and linguistic variability of accents present challenges for ASR systems in both data collection and modeling strategies. We present two promising approaches to accented speech recognition— custom vocabulary and multilingual modeling— and highlight key challenges in the space. Among these, lack of a standard benchmark makes research and comparison difficult. We address this with a novel corpus of accented speech: Earnings-22, A 125 file, 119 hour corpus of English-language earnings calls gathered from global companies. We compare commercial models showing variation in performance when taking country of origin into consideration and demonstrate targeted improvements using the methods we introduce.
Publisher
Uniwersytet Lodzki (University of Lodz)
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference38 articles.
1. Ardila, R., Branson, M., Davis, K., Henretty, M., Kohler, M., Meyer, J., Morais, R., Saunders, L., Tyers, F. M., & Weber, G.. (2020). Common Voice: A massively-multilingual speech corpus. Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pp. 4218-4222.
2. Arons, B. (1992). A Review of the Cocktail Party Effect. AVIOS.
3. Baese-Berk, M. M., McLaughlin, D. J. & McGowan, K. B. (2020). Perception of non-native speech. Language and Linguistics Compass, pp. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12375
4. Chang, X., Qian, Y., Yu, K. & Watanabe, S. (2019). End-To-End Monaural Multi-Speaker ASR System Without Pretraining. Proceedings of ICASSP. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2019.8682822
5. Chiswick, B. R. and Miller P. W. (2005). Linguistic distance: A quantitative measure of the distance between English and other languages. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710508668395