Abstract
The paper provides the addenda to A. Kompa, Gnesioi filoi: the search for George Syncellus’ and Theophanes the Confessor’s own words, and the authorship of their oeuvre, Studia Ceranea 5, 2015, p. 155–230. All the expressions crucial to the stylistic and stylometric argument on the authorship of the Chronography of Theophanes have been updated after 7 years and verified in the expanded TLG database. The updated results are presented below. The conclusions confirm the previous opinions on the individual, singular authorship of the chronicle of Theophanes with differences in style from the first part of the universal history, written by George Syncellus. At the same time, both works should be treated as a single project, and the prooimion to Theophanes’ part as a sound base faor the reconstruction of the writing process. The clauses ὡς προέφην, καθὼς καὶ προέφην, ὡς προέφημεν, and καθὼς προέφημεν are specific to the Chronography of Theophanes in their frequency and diversity, but they seem to be known and used by the circles from which Theophanes acquired his literary skills.
Publisher
Uniwersytet Lodzki (University of Lodz)
Subject
Religious studies,History,Cultural Studies
Reference15 articles.
1. Albrecht S., Theophanes Confessor, [in:] Encyclopedia of Medieval Chronicle, vol. II, J–Z, ed. G. Dunphry, Leiden–Boston 2010, p. 1421–1422.
2. Rebellen und Usurpatoren - Zur Benutzung der Theodor-Lector- Epitome durch Theophanes
3. Gnesioi filoi: the Search for George Syncellus’ and Theophanes the Confessor’s Own Words, and the Authorship of Their Oeuvre
4. Kompa A., In Search of Syncellus’ and Theophanes’ Own Words, and the Authorship of the Chronographia Revisited, “Travaux et mémoires” 19, 2015 (= Studies in Theophanes, ed. M. Jankowiak, F. Montinaro, Paris 2015), p. 73–92.
5. Pan Kubrat i jego pięciu synów. Teofanesa wizja przybycia Bułgarów na Półwysep Bałkański
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献