Personal Appraisals of Support from the Perspective of Polish, Slovak, and American Children Who Stutter
-
Published:2022-12-30
Issue:6
Volume:
Page:279-295
-
ISSN:2657-4381
-
Container-title:Logopaedica Lodziensia
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:logopaedica
Author:
Weidner MaryORCID, Węsierska KatarzynaORCID, Laciková HanaORCID, Sønsterud HildaORCID, Skogdal SignhildORCID, Åmodt KristinORCID, Scaler‑Scott KathleenORCID, Coleman CraigORCID
Abstract
Limited research exists about what children who stutter perceive to be helpful and unhelpful listener supports, and no known research exists cross‑culturally. Such information is necessary to better inform clinical intervention and public attitudes at large. This study sought to address that need by measuring listener preferences among children who stutter from diverse backgrounds.
One‑hundred fifty‑one children who stutter from Poland, Slovakia, and the USA completed the child version of the Personal Appraisal of Support for Stuttering. Results were examined descriptively and compared cross‑culturally.
Themes pertaining to very helpful and very unhelpful supports emerged across all groups. Many items fell in the neutral range, suggesting variability among individual speakers.
Based on the groups examined, children who stutter primarily want listeners to be patient, to include them, and to not laugh when they are speaking. Other nuanced preferences underscore the importance of asking individuals about what they perceive to be helpful and unhelpful. Results of this study informed a listener guideline statement and an open‑access informational handout about how to be most supportive of children who stutter.
Publisher
Uniwersytet Lodzki (University of Lodz)
Subject
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Reference25 articles.
1. American Speech‑Language‑Hearing Association, n.d., Evidence Based Practice, https://www.asha .org/research/ebp/ (accessed: 12.03.2022). 2. Blood G.W., Blood I .M., 2016, Long‑term consequences of childhood bullying in adults who stutter: Social anxiety, fear of negative evaluation, self‑esteem, and satisfaction with life, “Journal of Fluency Disorders”, No. 50, pp. 72–84. 3. Boyle M.P., Blood G.W., 2015, Stigma and stuttering: conceptualizations, applications, and coping, [in:] K.O. St. Louis (ed.), Stuttering meets stereotype, stigma, and discrimination: An overview of attitude research, Morgantown: West Virginia University Press, pp. 43–70. 4. Daniels D.E., Gabel R.M., Hughes S., 2012, Recounting the K–12 school experiences of adults who stutter: A qualitative analysis, “Journal of Fluency Disorders”, No. 37, pp. 71–82. 5. Davis S., Howell P., Cooke F., 2002, Sociodynamic relationships between children who stutter and their non‑stuttering classmates, “Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines”, No. 43, pp. 939–947.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|