Elite punitive populism and youth justice reform in Chile: Legitimizing a new political order

Author:

Rodriguez Gutierrez Daniela1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University College Dublin

Abstract

Chilean youth justice went through a drastic reform process during the 2000s, it was the second radical youth justice reform movement in the country since the creation of the Law of Minors in 1928. The decision to reform took place as Chile transitioned and stabilized into democracy after the authoritarian regime of the 1970s and 1980s. Superficially, it seems this is just one more way of embracing democracy and Human Rights. However, after in depth documental analysis of both the reform and the socio-political context, this paper offers a different insight and an explanation for the sudden relevance of youth justice, as a tool used by authoritarian political elites that then filtered into the political elite of the new democracy. In this context, populism played a key role in spreading concerns about youth offending and the need for a new youth justice which worked to strengthen the legitimacy of authoritarian practices in the new Chilean democratic order. It was an elite-driven populism that transformed youth justice into a key social and political concern.

Publisher

Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN (Institute of Law Studies PAS)

Reference99 articles.

1. Álvarez R. (2014). ‘La nueva política en el Chile postdictatorial: ¿Pasividad ciudadana o clientelismo desde abajo? (1990–1996)’ [The new politics in the post-dictatorship Chile: Passivity citizen or clientelism from below? (1990–1996)]. Estudos Ibero-Americanos 40, pp. 169–189.

2. Andrade D. (2020). ‘Populism from above and below: The path to regression in Brazil.’ Journal of Peasant Studies 47(7), pp. 1470–1496.

3. Ariño A. (1995). ‘Más allá de la sociología histórica’ [Beyond historical sociology]. Política y Sociedad 18, pp. 15–27.

4. Bachelet M. (2005). Programa de gobierno: Michelle Bachelet 2006–2010 [Government programme: Michelle Bachelet 2006–2010], Bnc.cl. Available online: https://www.bcn.cl/obtienearchivo?id=documentos/10221.1/13433/1/2005_programa-MB.pdf [15.12.2020].

5. Beckett K. and Godoy A. (2008). ‘Power, politics and penalty punitiveness as backlash in American Democracies.’ Studies in Law, Politics and Society 45, pp. 137–173.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3