Affiliation:
1. University College Dublin
Abstract
Chilean youth justice went through a drastic reform process during the 2000s, it was the second radical youth justice reform movement in the country since the creation of the Law of Minors in 1928. The decision to reform took place as Chile transitioned and stabilized into democracy after the authoritarian regime of the 1970s and 1980s. Superficially, it seems this is just one more way of embracing democracy and Human Rights. However, after in depth documental analysis of both the reform and the socio-political context, this paper offers a different insight and an explanation for the sudden relevance of youth justice, as a tool used by authoritarian political elites that then filtered into the political elite of the new democracy. In this context, populism played a key role in spreading concerns about youth offending and the need for a new youth justice which worked to strengthen the legitimacy of authoritarian practices in the new Chilean democratic order. It was an elite-driven populism that transformed youth justice into a key social and political concern.
Publisher
Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN (Institute of Law Studies PAS)
Reference99 articles.
1. Álvarez R. (2014). ‘La nueva política en el Chile postdictatorial: ¿Pasividad ciudadana o clientelismo desde abajo? (1990–1996)’ [The new politics in the post-dictatorship Chile: Passivity citizen or clientelism from below? (1990–1996)]. Estudos Ibero-Americanos 40, pp. 169–189.
2. Andrade D. (2020). ‘Populism from above and below: The path to regression in Brazil.’ Journal of Peasant Studies 47(7), pp. 1470–1496.
3. Ariño A. (1995). ‘Más allá de la sociología histórica’ [Beyond historical sociology]. Política y Sociedad 18, pp. 15–27.
4. Bachelet M. (2005). Programa de gobierno: Michelle Bachelet 2006–2010 [Government programme: Michelle Bachelet 2006–2010], Bnc.cl. Available online: https://www.bcn.cl/obtienearchivo?id=documentos/10221.1/13433/1/2005_programa-MB.pdf [15.12.2020].
5. Beckett K. and Godoy A. (2008). ‘Power, politics and penalty punitiveness as backlash in American Democracies.’ Studies in Law, Politics and Society 45, pp. 137–173.