Association of Primary Versus Rotating Nephrologist Model of Care in Hemodialysis Programs with Patient Outcomes

Author:

Yau Kevin123ORCID,Jeyakumar Nivethika45,Kang Yuguang45ORCID,Dixon Stephanie N.456ORCID,Freeman Megan1,Garg Amit X.456,Harel Ziv124ORCID,Sood Manish M.47,Thomas Alison1289,Wald Ron1234,Silver Samuel A.410ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Nephrology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

2. Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

3. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

4. ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

5. London Health Sciences Centre, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada

6. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada

7. Division of Nephrology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

8. Interprofessional Practice Based Research Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

9. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

10. Division of Nephrology, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

Significance Statement Nephrologist staffing models for patients receiving hemodialysis vary widely. Patients may be cared for continuously by a single primary nephrologist or by a group of nephrologists on a rotating basis. It remains unclear whether these differing care models influence clinical outcomes. In this population-based cohort study of more than 14,000 incident patients on maintenance hemodialysis from Ontario, Canada, we found no difference in mortality, kidney transplantation, home dialysis initiation, hospitalizations, or emergency department visits when care was provided by a single primary nephrologist or a rotating group of nephrologists. These results suggest that primary nephrologist models do not necessarily improve objective clinical outcomes, providing reassurance to patients, providers, and administrators that both models are acceptable options.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Nephrology,General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Multiple drugs;Reactions Weekly;2024-03-30

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3