PROBLEMS OF RECEPTION AND CONCEPTUALIZATION OF FUNDAMENTAL METHODOLOGIES ANALYTICALPHILOSOPHY OF LANGUAGE

Author:

Lebid Andrii1ORCID,Murashko Kateryna1

Affiliation:

1. Sumy State University

Abstract

The article examines the methodologies (paradigms) of realism and anti-realism, which are fundamental to analytic philosophy, and their representation in philosophical issues of semantics, reference, language-games, and communication. The study identifies the mythologemes of analytic philosophy and possible variations of its conceptualization based on style, methodology, subject matter, and topology. The author proceeds from the idea that analytical philosophy is the leading style of philosophizing in the Anglo-American cultural and philosophical topos, although it is ubiquitous in other regions as well. The achievements of analytical philosophy in the context of the development of world philosophical thought are quite significant, primarily because of the expansion of the range of philosophical problems and the proliferation of methods for solving them, in particular, in the plane of the discussion of analytical realist and anti-realist philosophers. The emergence of analytical philosophy on the philosophical horizon undoubtedly testified to the analytical nature of the twentieth century as the «century of analysis», the fundamental method of philosophizing which is the methodology of analysis, as interpretation for the sake of clarifying thought, revealing the logical structure of thought, eliminating semantic contradictions, detailed definitions, etc. The author emphasizes particularism, linguocentrism, logical and mathematical instrumentalism, orientation to the ideals of science and rationality, and other «norms» of analytic philosophy that testify to its primarily scientistic character.

Publisher

Sumy State University

Subject

Pharmacology (medical)

Reference17 articles.

1. Braun D.(2005). Empty names, fictional names, mythical names. Noûs. 2005. No39. P. 596-631.

2. Frege G.(1892). Über Sinn und Bedeutung. In: Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, N.F., Bd. 100/1. Leipzig: Verlag von C.E.M. Pfeffer, 1892. S.25-50.

3. Green M.(2007). Direct reference, empty names and implicature. Canadian journal of philosophy. Vol. 37, No3. P. 419-447.

4. Kripke S.(1980). Naming and necessity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1980. 288p.

5. McMichael A., Zalta E.(1980). An alternative theory of nonexistent objects. Journal of philosophical logic. 1980. Vol.9, No3. P. 297-313.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3