A Comparison of Online Peer Assessment and Face-to-face Peer Assessment

Author:

Güven Ufuk1,Kush Joseph2,Bilal Sezer Behlül1

Affiliation:

1. Düzce University, Turkey

2. Duquesne University, USA

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to compare students’ face-to-face and online peer assessment grades. In the first phase of the study, each student presented their work within a traditional classroom setting. The other students and the instructor provided grades based on a predefined rubric. In the second phase of the study, the same students presented their work within the same traditional classroom setting, however this time students and the instructor provided grades with their smartphones through a Web 2.0 tool. The study used student grades as the independent variable and grading method (face-to-face and online) as the dependent variable. Students’ peer assessments were also compared with the instructor’s grades to see in which assessment environment students gave instructor-like grades. Several paired t-tests were computed to compare groups. The results indicated that the students’ grades in face-to-face format was significantly higher than the students’ grades in online setting as well as the instructor’s face to face grades. In contrast, students provided instructor-like grades in online peer assessment setting. The study concluded that students give higher grades in face-to-face assessment setting. The most likely reason for this result is the peer pressure that exists in traditional classroom environment character.

Publisher

Sumy State University

Subject

Pharmacology (medical)

Reference68 articles.

1. Algahtani, A. (2011). Evaluating the Effectiveness of the E-learning Experience in Some Universities in Saudi Arabia from Male Students’ Perceptions. Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/3215/.

2. Bahar, M. (2014). Predictors of School and Course Achievement as Expressed by High School Learners: Turkish Context. 24-26 Nisan 2014. Іstanbul Üniversitesi, İstanbul. I. Avrasya Eğitim Araştırmaları Kongresi’nde sunulmuş bildiri.

3. Bartlett, J. E. II, Reynolds, K. A. & Alexander, M. W. (2000). A tool for online learning. Journal of Online Learning, 11(3–4), 22–24.

4. Benson, A. D. (2003). Assessing participant learning in online environments. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 100, 69-78.

5. Bostock, S. (2009). Student Peer Assessment.http://www.keele.ac.uk/depts/aa/landt/lt/docs/bostock_peer_assessment.htm

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3