Major Trauma Triage Tool Study (MATTS) expert consensus-derived injury assessment tool

Author:

Fuller Gordon1,Howes Nathan2,Mackenzie Roderick3,Keating Samuel4,Turner Janette5,Holt Chris4,Miller Joshua6,Goodacre Steve7

Affiliation:

1. University of Sheffield ORCID iD:, URL: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8532-3500

2. Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Magpas Air Ambulance ORCID iD:, URL: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7117-7045

3. Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Magpas Air Ambulance ORCID iD:, URL: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6004-0993

4. University of Sheffield

5. University of Sheffield ORCID iD:, URL: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3884-7875

6. West Midlands Ambulance Service ORCID iD:, URL: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1990-4029

7. University of Sheffield ORCID iD:, URL: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0803-8444

Abstract

Introduction: Major trauma centre (MTC) care has been associated with improved outcomes for injured patients. English ambulance services and trauma networks currently use a range of triage tools to select patients for bypass to MTCs. A standardised national triage tool may improve triage accuracy, cost-effectiveness and the reproducibility of decision-making.Methods: We conducted an expert consensus process to derive and develop a major trauma triage tool for use in English trauma networks. A web-based Delphi survey was conducted to identify and confirm candidate triage tool predictors of major trauma. Facilitated roundtable consensus meetings were convened to confirm the proposed triage tool’s purpose, target diagnostic threshold, scope, intended population and structure, as well as the individual triage tool predictors and cut points. Public and patient involvement (PPI) focus groups were held to ensure triage tool acceptability to service users.Results: The Delphi survey reached consensus on nine triage variables in two domains, from 109 candidate variables after three rounds. Following a review of the relevant evidence during the consensus meetings, iterative rounds of discussion achieved consensus on the following aspects of the triage tool: reference standard, scope, target diagnostic accuracy and intended population. A three-step tool comprising physiology, anatomical injury and clinical judgement domains, with triage variables assessed in parallel, was recommended. The triage tool was received favourably by PPI focus groups.Conclusions: This paper presents a new expert consensus derived major trauma triage tool with defined purpose, scope, intended population, structure, constituent variables, variable definitions and thresholds. Prospective evaluation is required to determine clinical and cost-effectiveness, acceptability and usability.

Publisher

Class Publishing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3