Affiliation:
1. Wageningen Food Safety Research (WFSR)
2. Fraunhofer ITEM
3. University of Chemistry and TechnologyPrague (UCT)
Abstract
Abstract
In the European Union, all chemical substances that are manufactured, imported or used in tonnages equal or higher than one tonne per year must be registered under the REACH regulation. This regulatory framework requires the collection and dissemination of detailed information on the properties, uses, and potential health and environmental impacts of chemicals. However, some of these chemicals may pose emerging risks in the food chain, necessitating the development of approaches to identify and assess such risks. The SCREENER project addressed this critical issue by analysing food items for the presence of chemicals that may pose unrecognised hazards.
Building on the findings from the previous REACH 1 and REACH 2 projects, which identified a suspect list of 212 chemicals, qualitative multi‐residue high‐resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) methods have been developed.
Diverse food items such as wheat flour, kale, carrots, potatoes, peas, strawberries, oranges, meat, hen's eggs, and trout were pooled from 3 samples each, while cow's milk, and other fish types (salmon and herring) were pooled from 4 samples each to form a single sample. This pooling procedure resulted in 194 analytical samples, which were screened for the presence of the chemicals in the suspect list.
Additionally, non‐target analysis (NTA) was performed on the same samples, focusing on detecting halogenated compounds. The aim was to detect substances potentially introduced into the food chain unintentionally through industrial and anthropogenic activities, which were previously unrecognised in the food chain.
In the final stage of the project, 15 chemicals were further prioritized for identification and quantitative analysis. Quantitative methods were developed and then applied to the same 194 samples, allowing for the identification and quantification of those chemicals. Subsequently, hazard characterization, exposure assessment, and risk characterisation were conducted. A preliminary characterization of the potential risk posed by the chemicals found in the samples during quantitative confirmatory analysis indicated no risk to human health in all but three cases where additional analysis on occurrence and detailed evaluation of the hazard can be considered as a possible follow‐up action in the future.
Reference41 articles.
1. Fast and easy multiresidue method employing acetonitrile extraction/partitioning and ‘dispersive solid‐phase extraction’ for the determination of pesticide residues in produce;Anastassiades;Journal of AOAC International,2003
2. AOAC Official Method 2007.01 . (n.d.). AOAC Official Method 2007.01 Pesticide Residues in Foods by Acetonitrile Extraction and Partitioning with Magnesium Sulfate Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry and Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry First Action 2007. Retrieved 1 February 2024, from https://nucleus.iaea.org/sites/fcris/SharedDocuments/SOP/AOAC_2007_01.pdf
3. Batke, M., Afrapoli, F. M., Kellner, R., Rathman, J. F., Yang, C., Cronin, M. T. D., & Escher, S. E. (2021). Threshold of Toxicological Concern‐An Update for Non‐Genotoxic Carcinogens. Frontiers in Toxicology, 3, 688321. https://doi.org/10.3389/ftox.2021.688321
4. Final report: Testing a procedure for the identification of emerging chemical risks in the food chain;Bitsch;External Scientific Report. OC/EFSA/SCER/2014/03. EFSA Supporting Publications,2016
5. REPDOSE: A database on repeated dose toxicity studies of commercial chemicals—A multifunctional tool;Bitsch;Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology,2006