The impact of the proposed revised Australia's microbiological monitoring programme for beef and sheep meat exported to the EU

Author:

,Blagojevic Bojan,Guillier Laurent,Lindqvist Roland,Hempen Michaela,Martino Laura,Goudjihounde Sonagnon Martin,Koutsoumanis Konstantinos

Abstract

Abstract The European Commission asks scientific and technical assistance from EFSA to determine the impact of the revision of the Australian monitoring programme on its ability to detect microbiological contamination. Considering that, in 2010, the European Commission determined the current Australian monitoring programme to be equivalent to the EU requirements for microbiological monitoring further to an EFSA scientific assessment, the current and proposed programmes were described and the total number of alerts was compared using a probabilistic modelling approach. In the current programme, only beef and sheep carcasses are monitored using three‐class moving window sampling plans, while in the proposed programme, carcass, bulk meat, primal and offal are monitored using four two‐class sampling plans and Salmonella testing is excluded. The models revealed that the current programme provides a higher number of alerts for APC, while the proposed monitoring programme provides a higher number of alerts for E. coli. For APC and E. coli combined, the mean, 5th and 95th centiles of the uncertainty distribution of the total number of alerts in the current and the proposed monitoring programme are 201 [179, 227] and 172 [149, 194] for beef, and 199 [175, 222] and 2897 [2795, 3008] for sheep, respectively. For Salmonella, there are no alerts for the proposed programme since sampling is excluded while for the current programme, the estimated mean, 5th and 95th centiles of the uncertainty distribution of the number of alerts for a 5‐year period were 143 [126, 144] for heifer/steer, 1.6 [0, 4] for cow/bull and 0 [0, 0] for lamb/sheep. Overall, for APC and E. coli, the estimated total number of alerts was similar (beef) or higher (sheep) for the proposed compared to the current programme. In contrast, Salmonella sampling is excluded from the proposed programme and thus cannot detect the number of current alerts.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference7 articles.

1. Principles of good practice for the use of Monte Carlo techniques in human health and ecological risk assessments;Burmaster;Risk Analysis,1994

2. DAFF (Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry), Australia . (2023). Microbiological manual for sampling and testing of export meat and meat products. Version 1.06, Australian Government. https://www.agriculture.gov.au/biosecurity‐trade/export/controlled‐goods/meat/elmer‐3/microbiological‐manual

3. DAFF (Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry), Australia . (2024). Microbiological monitoring results for bovine and ovine carcase production in Australia. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12645870

4. Fitdistrplus: An R package for fitting distributions;Delignette‐Muller;Journal of Statistical Software,2015

5. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) . (2010). The assessment of the comparison of the Australian monitoring programme for carcasses to requirements in regulation

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3