Assessment of genetically modified sugar beet H7‐1 for renewal of authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐006)-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Assessment of genetically modified sugar beet H7‐1 for renewal of authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐006)

Published:2017-11 Issue:11 Volume:15 Page:
ISSN:1831-4732
Container-title:EFSA Journal
language:
Short-container-title:EFS2

Author:

,Naegeli Hanspeter,Birch Andrew Nicholas,Casacuberta Josep,De Schrijver Adinda,Gralak Mikołaj Antoni,Guerche Philippe,Jones Huw,Manachini Barbara,Messéan Antoine,Nielsen Elsa Ebbesen,Nogué Fabien,Robaglia Christophe,Rostoks Nils,Sweet Jeremy,Tebbe Christoph,Visioli Francesco,Wal Jean‐Michel,Fernandez‐Dumont Antonio,Gennaro Andrea,Ramon Matthew

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Plant Science,Veterinary (miscalleneous),Animal Science and Zoology,Microbiology,Food Science,Parasitology

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5065/fullpdf

Reference3 articles.

1. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on an application (reference EFSA‐GMO‐UK‐2004‐08) for the placing on the market of products produced from glyphosate‐tolerant genetically modified sugar beet H7‐1, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from KWS SAAT and Monsanto;EFSA;EFSA Journal,2006

2. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2015. Explanatory note on DNA sequence similarity searches in the context of the assessment of horizontal gene transfer from plants to microorganisms. EFSA Supporting Publication 2015:12(12);EN‐916, 10 pp. https://doi.org/10.2903/sp.efsa.2015.en-916

3. Guidance for renewal applications of genetically modified food and feed authorised under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003;EFSA GMO Panel;EFSA Journal,2015

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Risk assessment of new sequencing information for genetically modified sugar beet H7‐1;EFSA Journal;2022-06

2. Agricultural GMOs—What We Know and Where Scientists Disagree;Sustainability;2018-05-10