Author:
,Hardy Anthony,Benford Diane,Halldorsson Thorhallur,Jeger Michael John,Knutsen Helle Katrine,More Simon,Naegeli Hanspeter,Noteborn Hubert,Ockleford Colin,Ricci Antonia,Rychen Guido,Schlatter Josef R,Silano Vittorio,Solecki Roland,Turck Dominique,Benfenati Emilio,Chaudhry Qasim Mohammad,Craig Peter,Frampton Geoff,Greiner Matthias,Hart Andrew,Hogstrand Christer,Lambre Claude,Luttik Robert,Makowski David,Siani Alfonso,Wahlstroem Helene,Aguilera Jaime,Dorne Jean‐Lou,Fernandez Dumont Antonio,Hempen Michaela,Valtueña Martínez Silvia,Martino Laura,Smeraldi Camilla,Terron Andrea,Georgiadis Nikolaos,Younes Maged
Subject
Plant Science,Veterinary (miscalleneous),Animal Science and Zoology,Microbiology,Food Science,Parasitology
Reference71 articles.
1. Weight of evidence evaluation and systematic review in EU chemical risk assessment: Foundation is laid but guidance is needed;Ågerstrand;Environment International,2016
2. ANSES , 2016. Evaluation du poids des preuves à l'Anses: revue critique de la littérature et recommandations à l’étape d'identification des dangers. Rapport d'expertise collective. Saisine 2015‐SA‐0089, 116 pp.
3. Increasing Scientific Confidence in adverse outcome pathways: application of tailored bradford‐hill considerations for evaluating weight of evidence;Becker;Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology,2015
4. Facilitating the use of non‐standard in vivo studies in health risk assessment of chemicals: a proposal to improve evaluation criteria and reporting;Beronius;Journal of Applied Toxicology,2014
5. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT and Rothstein HR, 2009. Introduction to meta‐analysis. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
Cited by
272 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献