The Implications of Armstrong v. Executive of the President for the Archival Management of Electronic Records

Author:

Bearman David1

Affiliation:

1. Archives and Museum Informatics

Abstract

This article reviews the arguments presented by both sides in the lawsuit Armstrong v. the Executive Office of the President, which concerned the electronic mail created by the Reagan and Bush White House on the IBM PROFS system. It examines the emerging consensus among archivists worldwide on approaches to managing electronic records and considers the ways in which the position taken by the government failed to reflect best practices. Specifically, it examines recent discussions of functional requirements for recordkeeping systems and raises some implications of a functional perspective for archival programs and strategies. It concludes by arguing that archivists will need to play a more active role in the society at large in order to ensure that the broader culture understands and acts on the threats to accountability presented by computer-based electronic communications.

Publisher

Society of American Archivists

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Positioning Paradata: A Conceptual Frame for AI Processual Documentation in Archives and Recordkeeping Contexts;Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage;2023-11-16

2. Electronic Records Management - An Old Solution to a New Problem;Big Data;2016

3. Electronic Records Management - An Old Solution to a New Problem;International Journal of Electronic Government Research;2014-10

4. A strategic approach to making sense of the “wicked” problem of ERM;Records Management Journal;2013-07-19

5. Electronic records management;Annual Review of Information Science and Technology;2006-10-18

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3