Abstract
Abstract
While considerable progress in research in the field of Forensic Economics has been achieved over the past 35 years, a number of areas of need for further research persist. This paper provides an overview of the scope of research in the field and the critiques of that research gathered through member surveys, submissions by journal editors, and publications of Richard Posner and the author.
Publisher
Journal of Forensic Economics
Reference29 articles.
1. Brookshire,
Michael,
1991.
“Agenda for Future Research in Forensic Economics.”Journal of Forensic Economics,
4(3):
287–
296.
2. Brookshire,
Michael,
Slesnick,
Frank
and
Lessne,Robert
1990.
“The Emerging Industry of Forensic Economics: A Survey of NAFE Members.”Journal of Forensic Economics,
3(2):
15–
29.
3. Brookshire,
Michael,
and
Slesnick,Frank
1993.
“1993 Survey Of NAFE Members: A Follow–Up Survey Of Economic Methodology.”Journal of Forensic Economics,
7(1):
25–
46.
4. Brookshire,
Michael,
and
Slesnick,Frank
1999.
“1999 Survey Study of Forensic Economists—Their Methods and Their Estimates of Forecast Variables.”Litigation Economics Review,
4(2):
65–
96.
5. Brookshire,
Michael L.,
Luthy,
Michael R.
and
Slesnick,Frank L.
2003.
“Forensic Economists, Their Methods and Estimates of Forecast Variables: A 2003 Survey Study.”Litigation Economics Review,
6(2):
28–
44.