The Limits of Memory and the News: Archival Journalism, Law, Ethics, and the Right to be Forgotten

Author:

Cetina Presuel RodrigoORCID,Gutiérrez Atala Fernando JoséORCID

Abstract

The right to be forgotten has been widely discussed from a legal perspective. Courts have analyzed the existence and constitutional compatibility of the right in the national legal order of several jurisdictions around the world. However, even if the right to be forgotten is not a universally recognized right, by understanding how the law approaches tensions that arise between the right to freedom of expression and the rights to seek, impart and receive information, on one hand, and a right to be forgotten, underpinned by the rights to honor, privacy and personal data protection on the other, journalists can extract ethical guidelines that can orient them in the correct use of archival information about individuals to report on current events. This work begins by explaining how legal debates can help inform ethical discussions about journalism. Then, by exploring the legal development and justifications for the right to be forgotten and identifying key elements of this emerging right, we engage in a discussion around the use of archives and memory in journalism and then identify the elements that journalists should consider in relation to the use of archival information in their profession in a way that allows them to fulfill their journalistic duties without ignoring the legal context.

Publisher

Universidad de Piura

Subject

Communication

Reference132 articles.

1. Almirón, N. & Jarque, J. (2008). El mito digital. Discursos hegemónicos sobre Internet y periodismo. Anthropos.

2. Anguita, P. (2016). Acciones de Protección contra Google. Librotecnia.

3. Anguita, P. (2018). Medios de Comunicación y el Derecho al Olvido en Chile. In Labrador, M. J. & Carter, E. (Eds.), Google: El Derecho al Olvido y Desafíos Éticos en el escenario mediático digital, Ril.

4. Anguita, P. (2018). The Right to be Forgotten in Chile. Doctrine and Jurisprudence, in Tambou,

5. O. & Bourton, S. (Eds.), The Right to be Forgotten in Europe and Beyond, Series Open Access Book, Blog droit Européen.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3