Disinformation about COVID-19 in Ibero-America: An Analysis of Fact Checkers

Author:

Massarani Luisa,Medeiros Amanda,Waltz Igor,Leal Tatiane

Abstract

In light of the intense information disorder that has ensued since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, the aim of this study is to analyze the similarities and differences between the disinformation circulating in three countries, based on the posts of their pioneering fact-checking organizations: Agência Lupa (Brazil), Newtral (Spain), and Jornal Polígrafo (Portugal). A quantitative and qualitative content analysis (Bardin, 2011) was run on the fact checks (n = 87) performed by the three organizations in March 2021, 12 months after the pandemic had been declared by the World Health Organization, using the analytical categories “classification”, “medium”, “format”, “source”, and “topic”. The disinformation identified in the three countries shared three similarities, namely, a predominance of false content, the primary use of text formats, and the dissemination of disinformation on social media platforms. As to the sources cited and subject matter, differences were found in the strategies employed to validate the disinformation and in the topics covered. It can be concluded that while the pandemic was a global phenomenon, the disinformation circulating about it was influenced by the political, social, and cultural particularities of each country.

Publisher

Malaga University

Reference42 articles.

1. Allcott, Hunt, & Gentzkow, Mathew (2017): “Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election”, in Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31 (2), pp. 211-236. Doi: https:// doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211

2. Bardin, Laurence (2011): Análise de conteúdo. Edições 70.

3. Brennan, J. Scott; Simon, Felix Marvin; Howard, Philip N.; & Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis (2020): Types, Sources, and Claims of COVID-19 Misinformation. Oxford: Reuters Institute/University of Oxford. Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/types-sources-and-claims-covid-19-misinformation

4. Cardoso, Gustavo; Pinto-Martinho, Ana; Narciso, Inês; Moreno, José; Crespo, Miguel; Palma, Nuno; & Sepúlveda, Rita (2020): Information and misinformation on the Coronavirus in Portugal: Whatsapp, Facebook e Google Searches. Lisbon: Media Lab. Retrieved from https://medialab.iscte-iul.pt/information-and-misinformation-coronavirus-in-portugal/

5. Ceron, Wilson; De-Lima-Santos, Mathias-Felipe; & Quiles, Marcos G. (2021): “Fake News Agenda in the Era of COVID-19: Identifying Trends through Fact-Checking Content”, in Online Social Networks and Media, 21, pp. 1-14. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.os- nem.2020.100116

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3