Abstract
The purpose of this study was to better understand where and how Tennessee consumers receive information about genetically modified (GM) products by examining the use of informational channels and sources among consumers with negative-leaning, neutral, and positive-leaning perceptions of GM products. Twenty percent of respondents were categorized as having negative-leaning perceptions, roughly two-thirds held neutral perceptions, and only 10% of respondents had positive-leaning perceptions. The use of information channels was similar across all perception groups, with websites, word-of-mouth communication, television, and social media as the primary channels used. However, respondents with negative GM perceptions primarily used food bloggers, family, and friends as informational sources, while those with positive-leaning perceptions used food scientists, USDA professionals, and agricultural producers. The findings of this study offer implications for a variety of audiences and communication goals, whether such goals be to market to an existing consumer base or develop an educational campaign to address misconceptions among consumer groups.
Publisher
Advancements in Agricultural Development, Inc.
Reference39 articles.
1. Abbott, E. A., Lucht, T., Jensen, J. P., & Jordan-Conde, Z. (2001, January 09–10). Handling of GM crop issues by the mass media. 2001 Illinois Crop Protection Technology Conference, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL, United States.
2. Abbott, E. A., & Lucht, T. (2001, August 5–8). Riding the hoopla: An analysis of mass media coverage of GMOs in Britain and the United States. Science Communication Interest Group, Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Washington D.C., United States.
3. Aleksejeva, I. (2014). Latvian consumers’ knowledge about genetically modified organisms. Organizacijų Vadyba: Sisteminiai Tyrimai, 2014(72), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.7220/mosr.2335.8750.2014.71.1
4. Aqil, A., Lippeveld, T., & Hozumi, D. (2009). PRISM framework: A paradigm shift for designing, strengthening and evaluating routine health information systems. Health Policy and Planning 24(3), 217–228. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czp010
5. Baker, R., Brick, J. M., Bates, N. A., Battaglia, M., Couper, M. P., Dever, J. A., Gile, K. J., & Tourangeau, R. (2013). Summary report of the AAPOR task force on non-probability sampling. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 1(2), 90–143. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smt008
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献