Analyzing and visualizing repeated-measures needs assessment data using the ranked discrepancy model

Author:

Narine LendelORCID,Harder AmyORCID

Abstract

The Ranked Discrepancy Model was introduced in 2021 as an alternative for analyzing Borich-style competency-based needs assessment data which avoided the pitfalls associated with the original methods for analysis. In this article, we sought to expand upon that work by developing and testing a new framework to analyze and visualize repeated-measures needs assessment data using the Ranked Discrepancy Model (RDM). Data for the analyses were taken from statewide community needs assessments conducted in Utah and Florida with paid survey panelists recruited by an online survey vendor. We found it was possible to apply the RDM to repeated-measures data using Microsoft Excel. A comparison of results obtained from analyzing data using paired t-tests and the RDM model showed strong positive correlations. Additionally, the transition to a spreadsheet format enabled the expansion of data analysis possibilities to include sorting needs by demographic subgroups. We recommend researchers use Excel for the RDM so they can easily examine subgroup needs and apply data visualization techniques to improve the utility of needs assessments and the decisions made by the individuals who interpret the results.

Publisher

Advancements in Agricultural Development, Inc.

Reference30 articles.

1. Altschuld, J. W., & White, J. L. (2010). Needs assessment: Analysis and prioritization. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230542

2. Beck, F., Burch, M., Diehl, S., & Weiskopf, D. (2017). A taxonomy and survey of dynamic graph visualization. Computer Graphics Forum, 36(1), 133-159. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.12791

3. Borich, G. D. (1980). A needs assessment model for conducting follow-up studies. The Journal of Teacher Education, 31(3), 39-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718003100310

4. Brinker, G. D. (2002). Using standard scores to control for extreme response style bias. Journal of Applied Sociology, 19(2), 81-99. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43481457

5. Chaudhary, A., & Warner, L. (2022). Identifying gaps between importance and satisfaction to identify extension clients' needs. EDIS. https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/WC252

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3