Visual Q methodology: A methodological approach to empower marginalized populations in agriculture throughout the global south

Author:

Roberts RichieORCID

Abstract

Ensuring that marginalized populations become empowered in agriculture is vital to the success of global agricultural development goals. However, these populations have reported lacking access, power, and voice. Perhaps one strategy researchers can use to address this issue is through visual Q methodology. In this methodological paper, I argue that by combining the tenets of Q and visual methodologies, researchers can offer empirically grounded findings that evoke powerful, rich insight into the perspectives of marginalized populations in agriculture who may lack the communication skills to articulate their perspectives through words. To this point, however, the approach has lacked clear guidance, which has led to diminished quality in the published literature on visual Q methodology. In response, I offer six principles to guide visual Q methodological studies moving forward: (a) relationship-building with participants, (b) participant training, (c) concourse development, (d) Q set sampling, (e) data collection, and (f) data analysis and interpretation.

Publisher

Advancements in Agricultural Development, Inc.

Subject

General Medicine

Reference40 articles.

1. Agard, A. C., & Roberts, R. (2020). A re-envisioned agricultural system in Thailand: The growth in human capital experienced by agriculturalists after adoption of the sufficiency economic philosophy. Advancements in Agricultural Development, 1(3), 14-26. http://agdevresearch.org/index.php/aad/article/view/67/43

2. Azizian, A., Watson, T. D., Parvaz, M. A., & Squires, N. K. (2006). Time course of processes underlying picture and word evaluation: An event-related potential approach. Brain Topography, 18(3), 213-232. https://www.proquest.com/openview/66daf1b9f0aeeb4fcdbab358a2d82f11/1?cbl=37296&pq-origsite=gscholar&parentSessionId=zqk70B5zkplJPKSvAFUPBrt8Iw3%2Bop%2FxkGRTXaxz24s%3D

3. Brown, S. R. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. Yale University Press.

4. Brown, S. R. (2000). Q methodology in assessment and research. Kent State University.

5. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Innovating methods of agricultural development research and practice;Advancements in Agricultural Development;2024-01-31

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3