Physiologic and pathologic septal deviations: subjective and objective functional rhinologic findings

Author:

Gogniashvilli G.,Steinmeier E.,Mlynski G.,Beule A.G.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A high incidence of septal deviation with significant inter-rater variability has been reported. An explanation could be the presence of physiological septal deviation besides pathological ones. We differentiated an unselected cohort by their nasal resistance into groups with physiological normal and pathologically increased resistance to detect differences and analogies in comparison to healthy subjects and a pathological cohort. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: A total of 356 patients were assessed using rhinoresistometry, acoustic rhinometry, endoscopy and visual analogue scales. After definition of a benchmark between physiological and pathological nasal resistance, group differences were calculated and correlations analysed. RESULTS: The normal one-sided inspiratory nasal resistance was defined as less or equal to 0.35 sPa/cm^3 at a flow-velocity of 250 cm^3/s (R250). Using this benchmark, the unselected group of non-rhinological patients was differentiated into 114 subjects with physiological nasal resistance and 44 with pathological septal deviation. Nasal resistance after decongestion was significantly lower for normal or patients with a physiological septal deviation in comparison to the rhinological one on both nasal sides. Healthy subjects and patients with physiological septal deviation showed similarities in objective rhinological parameters as well as rhinological patients and patients with pathological septal deviation derived from the unselected group of non-rhinological patients. Furthermore, this benchmark of nasal resistance shows significant correlations with subjective assessment of nasal breathing. CONCLUSION: Inspiratory nasal resistance obtained at a flow-velocity of 250 cm^3/s using rhinoresistometry may be useful to distinguish patients with physiological and pathological septal deviation. Correlation with subjective assessment and endoscopic findings is improved.

Publisher

Stichting Nase

Subject

Otorhinolaryngology,General Medicine

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Physiology of the Nasal Cartilages and Their Importance to Rhinosurgery;Nasal Physiology and Pathophysiology of Nasal Disorders;2023

2. New Measurement Methods in the Diagnostic of Nasal Obstruction;Nasal Physiology and Pathophysiology of Nasal Disorders;2023

3. Physiology and Pathophysiology of Nasal Breathing;Nasal Physiology and Pathophysiology of Nasal Disorders;2023

4. The new agreement of the international RIGA consensus conference on nasal airway function tests;Rhinology journal;2018-06-01

5. Objective Assessment of Nasal Patency;Facial Plastic Surgery;2017-07-28

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3