Affiliation:
1. Department of Linguistics, Yale University
Abstract
This paper discusses cases where non-adjacent cells in morphological paradigms are syncretic, commonly called ABA patterns (Bobaljik 2012 et seqq.). Data from verbs in Germanic languages are examined, as earlier work suggests that a *ABA constraint may be active in this domain. It will be shown that there are verbs in several Germanic languages which exhibit genuine ABA patterns, precluding an analysis based on a constraint *ABA. It is suggested that the rarity of ABA patterns should instead be given a diachronic explanation in terms of Proto-Germanic conjugation classes. This approach is independently motivated by frequency asymmetries in modern Germanic languages, and correctly predicts where ABA patterns are more likely to appear. The research reported here adds to a rapidly-growing body of work on extralinguistic explanations for linguistic patterns (Anderson 2016), suggesting a severely reduced explanatory role for formal linguistic constraints.
Publisher
Open Library of the Humanities
Reference62 articles.
1. Patterns and discriminability in language analysis;Ackerman, FarrellRobert MaloufJames P. Blevins;Word Structure,2016
2. A-Morphous Morphology
3. Synchronic versus diachronic explanation and the nature of the language faculty;Anderson, Stephen R.;Annual Review of Linguistics,2016
4. He, he, it: Against universal restrictions on gender syncretism;Andersson, Samuel,2017
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献