Abstract
Economic threats, along with political identities and ideologies, are associated with affective polarization. However, there is still a need to learn more about the consequences of different economic threats and identities fueling polarization. We take a longitudinal perspective in testing the influence of these phenomena on affective polarization. Specifically, we tested the effect of subjective personal and collective economic threats and political, national, regional, and European identities on affective polarization towards politicians and partisans in Spain. We use four waves of the E-DEM panel study from Spain (N = 2,501) collected between 2018 and 2019. We conducted longitudinal multilevel analyses to determine the growth in affective polarization and included predictors at the between- and within-person levels. Consistent with our hypotheses, we found that collective economic threats, such as perceiving more unfairness in the distribution of wealth and being dissatisfied with the Spanish economy, positively predict affective polarization. Contrary to our expectations, personal economic threats did not predict affective polarization. Furthermore, political and national identities positively predicted affective polarization towards politicians and partisans. Interestingly, exploratory analyses suggested that the associations between economic threats, identities, and affective polarization are moderated by political ideology. We discuss how economic threats and identities may exacerbate animosities toward political actors.
Funder
Horizon 2020
Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Reference61 articles.
1. The sensitive left and the impervious right: Multilevel models and the politics of inequality, ideology, and legitimacy in Europe;Comparative Political Studies,2008
2. The policy mood in Spain: The thermostat in a warm climate, 1978–2017;European Political Science Review,2020
3. Ideology and the promotion of social change;Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences,2020
4. A regional perspective to the study of affective polarization;European Journal of Political Research,2022
5. The complicated but solvable threat–politics relationship;Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2022