Affiliation:
1. University of Oklahoma, 780 Van Vleet Oval, Norman, OK 73019
Abstract
It is standardly assumed that nominals in the languages of the world are syntactically complex in the typical case, being made up of not just NP, but one or more functional projections, e.g., DP (Abney 1987). Recently, this assumption has been questioned, especially for languages without articles (Bošković 2005, et seq.). The alternative proposal holds that nominals in Serbo-Croatian (and more strongly, languages without articles in general) lack the DP projection, and that this difference has a variety of syntactic consequences. In this paper, I investigate the nominal extended projection of another language without articles, Estonian (Finno-Ugric). On the basis of a number of facts about Estonian’s system of adnominal genitives, I conclude that nominals in Estonian should not be given the same analysis as those in Serbo-Croatian. I propose instead that Estonian’s nominals are DPs. I then propose that indefinite pronouns and wh-determiners instantiate the category D0 in the language, arguing that DP does more cross-linguistically than host articles. I conclude that nominal structure in languages without articles can be just as complex as nominal structure in languages with articles.
Publisher
Open Library of the Humanities
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference92 articles.
1. Linear asymmetries and the LCA;Abels, KlausAd Neeleman;Syntax,2012
2. Abney, Steven Paul. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
3. Opaque and transparent datives, and how they behave in passives;Alexiadou, ArtemisElena AnagnostopoulouChristina Sevdali;The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics,2014
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献